Comments and criticism comments on “a research methodology for studying how people think”
- 作者Michael Shayer
- 卷第23卷
- 期第9期
- 印刷ISSN0022-4308
- 电子ISSN1098-2736
- 文件大小117.09KB
- 发表时间1986
- DOI10.1002/tea.3660230909
- 页码849-850
Prenatal Fluoride / Author’s Response / Extension for Prevention / Author’s Response / The Pill and Gingival Changes / Author’s Response / Carrots and Hypervitaminosis A / Author’s ResponseBell, James M.; Schrotenboer, Gordon; B’rells, G.K.; Goldstein, Ronald; Tipton, Dorsey R.; Scholle, Roger H.; R., W.; Schrotenboer, Gordon · The Journal of the American Dental Association · 1973
Author’s Response / Authors’ ResponseHamburg, Harold L.; Schwartz, J. Leon · The Journal of the American Dental Association · 1980
Author’s Response: SHOX—A Geneticist’s ViewRosenfeld, Ron G. · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2002
Author’s response:Stephen Gloyd · 2002
Author’s responseSeung Hyup Kim · 1992
Author’s letter in responseM. Scheflan · 1989
Author’s responsePaul Griffiths · 1999
Author’s responseSharon Beder · 1998
Comments on perpetuating the “antagonistic dilemma”Edmund A. Marek · 1985
Why the learning cycle?Edmund A. Marek · 2008
BacktalkJames Sanzare, Nicholas Kostra, Susan Staub, Edmund A. Marek, John W. Renner, William H. Fisher, William G. Lamb and Ernest J. Sternglass · The Phi Delta Kappan · 1983
Research reportCavallo, Ann; McNeely, Jack C.; Marek, Edmund A. · International Journal of Science Education · 2003
The Learning Cycle: A ReintroductionMaier, Steven J.; Marek, Edmund A. · The Physics Teacher · 2006
An educational theory base for science teachingJohn W. Renner; Edmund A. Marek · 1990
Relationships among gender, age, and intellectual developmentLilian De Hernandez; Edmund A. Marek; John W. Renner · 1984