“Soft” Versus “Hard” Psychological Science: Biased Evaluations of Scientific Evidence That Threatens or Supports a Strongly Held Political Identity
- 期刊名称Basic and Applied Social Psychology
- 作者Munro, Geoffrey D.; Munro, Cynthia A.
- 卷第36卷
- 期第6期
- 印刷ISSN0197-3533
- 电子ISSN1532-4834
- 文件大小279.82KB
- 发表时间2014-11-02
- DOI10.1080/01973533.2014.960080
- 页码533-543
Freedom, License, and ResponsibilityRichard K. Betts · 2007
Paranoids, Pygmies, Pariahs & NonproliferationRichard K. Betts · Foreign Policy · 1977
Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis? Reply to LuttwakRichard K. Betts · International Security · 1983
Michael I. HandelRichard K. Betts · PS: Political Science and Politics · 2001
The Tragicomedy of Arms Trade ControlRichard K. Betts · International Security · 1980
Surprise Attack: NATO's Political VulnerabilityRichard K. Betts · International Security · 1981
Conventional Strategy: New Critics, Old ChoicesRichard K. Betts · International Security · 1983
A Diplomatic Bomb for South Africa?Richard K. Betts · International Security · 1979
No one loves a political realistGilpin, Robert G. · Security Studies · 1996
The Primacy of Premodern HistoryGrygiel, Jakub · Security Studies · 2013
Kenneth Waltz, Neorealism, and Foreign PolicyTelbami, S. · Security Studies · 2002
Apologies in International PoliticsLind, Jennifer · Security Studies · 2009
Audience Cost Theory and Its AudiencesSlantchev, Branislav L. · Security Studies · 2012
Audience Costs: An Historical AnalysisTrachtenberg, Marc · Security Studies · 2012
Audience Costs Are ToysMercer, Jonathan · Security Studies · 2012
Thucydides’ critique of realpolitikRahe, Paul A. · Security Studies · 1995